Your Code Reviewed by an AI That's Seen 8 Years of Enterprise Changesets
We built this system to review our own team's code — thousands of TFVC changesets across an enterprise platform serving Fortune 500 clients. It caught real bugs, real security holes, and real architectural drift. Now it's available as a service.
Code Quality Isn't Optional — But Manual Review Doesn't Scale
Technical Debt Accumulates Silently
Every shortcut, every 'I'll fix it later,' every PR that got rubber-stamped — it compounds. By the time technical debt shows up as a production incident, the cost to fix it is 10x what it would have been at review time.
Offshore Code Quality Is Hard to Control
Distributed teams produce quality code when they have clear guardrails. Without automated enforcement, architectural patterns drift, security practices slip, and naming conventions scatter.
Compliance Requires Proof
HIPAA, SOC 2, PCI-DSS — compliance frameworks don't just ask 'is your code secure?' They ask 'can you prove it?' Automated review generates structured, auditable reports.
From Changeset to Actionable Report in Minutes
Changeset Ingestion
Connects to Azure DevOps (TFVC), Git, or GitHub. Pulls changed files, identifies the diff, and filters to reviewable code.
Multi-Layer Security Scanning
Snyk SAST for vulnerability patterns. Gitleaks for secret detection. NuGet SCA for dependency vulnerabilities. Roslyn for C# static analysis.
AI-Powered Code Analysis
Claude analyzes for SOLID adherence, architectural compliance, complexity, error handling, and business logic correctness.
Report Generation
Structured report by severity — Critical, High, Medium, Low. Each finding includes line number, description, and concrete fix guidance.
Verdict
Approved, Approved with Comments, Changes Requested, or Veto. Clear, actionable, no ambiguity.
Severity Classification
| Severity | Meaning | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, hardcoded secrets | Blocks deployment |
| High | Null refs, resource leaks, race conditions | Must address before merge |
| Medium | SOLID violations, duplication, complexity > 10 | Should address |
| Low | Naming conventions, missing async suffix | At convenience |
“We built it because we needed it.”
Our team manages an enterprise codebase powering 80+ client storefronts across Fortune 500 and mid-market brands in hospitality, healthcare, financial services, and retail. With distributed teams and thousands of changesets per year, manual code review couldn't keep up. So we automated it — and used it ourselves for over a year before offering it externally.
See What Your Code Review Is Missing
Send us a recent changeset or pull request. We'll run it through the full pipeline — security scanning, AI analysis, severity classification — and send you the report. No commitment. Just data.
One free review. Real results. No sales pitch attached.